Showing posts with label Evangelism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evangelism. Show all posts

Monday, February 6, 2017

Book Review: "Preaching Killer Sermons" by Lane Sebring

Lane Sebring, Preaching Killer Sermons: How to Create and Deliver Messages that Captivate and Inspire (Centreville, VA: Preaching Donkey, 2016), 191 pp. $12.48.

I took my first official preaching course in the Fall 1999 semester.  In that course, I was introduced to a text that laid the foundation for my communicative practice in preaching, tips and tricks that I still use today.  A decade later, when I taught my first introductory preaching course, I used that same book, Preaching that Connects by Mark Galli and Craig Larson (both, then, journalists with Christianity Today).  Their material was simple, basic, almost common-sense.  It was pulled from a combined decades of journalism, writing stories with punch that related to the everyday reader.  Although not necessarily preachers themselves, they wrote a book that, in my opinion, every preacher must read.  It is not a theory book; it is a mechanics book, yet one that will absolutely help your development.

You see, when it comes to preaching, to the art of crafting sermons, it comes down to 3 “Ds”: design, development and delivery.  Design has to do with the scaffolding or main structure that the preacher chooses to build the sermon on.  The design is the “bones” of the sermon.  Whether it is inductive (moving from general to specific), deductive (moving from specific to general), narrative (following a plot) or some other syllogistic form, all sermons, when deconstructed down to their base parts look exactly the same.  It’s basic rhetorical design, something that has been with us since Aristotle.

Now, development deals with the “stuff” that goes into our weekly sermons: textual commentary, illustrations, points of doctrine, and practical applications.  This is the blood, muscles and tissue of the sermon.  It’s the stuff that keeps our sermon alive long enough to be presented to a congregation, small group or digital audience. 

Then, there is delivery, or the way the sermon or message is presented.  To finish off the anatomy lesson, this is the skin of the sermon.  It’s the presentation, how the sermon looks and sounds to the audience.  If we do our jobs correctly, the audience should come away with a captivating, transformative experience that leads them closer to God and challenges them to better resemble their faith in Christ to their fellow humans.

Most books in preaching, essentially, land in one of these three camps, such as The Four Voices of Preaching by Robert Stephen Reid (design) or Speaking with Bold Assurance by Bert Decker and Hershael York (delivery).  Some, such as Expository Preaching by Harold Bryson, Preach by Mark Dever and Greg Gilbert or The Modern Preacher and the Ancient Text by Sidney Greidanus, will try to land in two of the camps (usually design and development or development and delivery).  And, on scarce, blessed occasions, some will pull off the impossible and land in all three camps, such as classic texts like Preaching by Fred Craddock or The Witness of Preaching by Tom Long or Biblical Preaching by Haddon Robinson.  And when those books come along, they remain mainstays in the preacher’s library.

A new contender has come along that claims to be worthy of your and my attention in at least two of these camps, if not all three.  Enter Lane Sebring and his book Preaching Killer Sermons.  It’s a bold claim to be sure, especially from such a young minister and author.  You see, most of the above books have come from seasoned preachers.  Yet, most of their best works, ironically, came after they left the work of weekly preaching.  Preaching Killer Sermons comes from one who is deeply involved in ministry, as he serves as a minister who preaches each and every week.  There is something deeply comforting in that thought, very ethos-centric.  For in entering into this conversation, we are entering into it with one who is like us, who shares our struggles and our successes, and wants to share out of his common experience in an effort to build us up as we preach the gospel.

Ultimately, Preaching Killer Sermons is best understood as a delivery book.  And it is a fantastic book on sermon delivery.  His discussions on sharing the sermon in a way that relates well to our contemporary cultural context without compromising the integrity of the text, delivery mechanics and being intentional about self-care are absolutely worth the cost of this book.  Even his opening chapter on parsing a boring sermon is spot-on.  As I was reading, I found myself shaking my head because I have been guilty of a sin or two (and I have a doctorate in preaching!).  And if that was all this book was about, I would enthusiastically recommend this book for any preacher, novice or veteran. 

However, Sebring tries to do more in his one-stop shop preaching text.  And therein lies the problem.  As I mentioned above, there are three “Ds” to preaching—design, development and delivery.  Sebring nails delivery.  And, for the most part, he does an appropriately-decent job with development.  His main flaw is in design, for three reasons.  First, he claims no underlying theories are being promoted, yet he alludes to Aristotle’s concept of rhetoric as a basic model for communication (p. 112-113).  Second, his chapter entitled “Putting Your Sermon to Work” sounds like it has been inspired by Haddon Robinson’s book Biblical Preaching.  And third, he presents four “outline” approaches to designing sermons (p. 71-79), most of which have been largely dismissed by educators, communicators and preachers alike due to inability of those methods in producing true learning or transformative spiritual growth.


Fortunately, this is only a small portion of his book.  As I also stated above, the true strength in this book is his material on delivery, material that comes from a preacher who is in the pulpit each and every week and who is connecting with unchurched persons.  So, even with my concerns, this is a book that I would recommend…and maybe even start using as a textbook!

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

2013 Reading List

Note: I realize it is a tad late, given today is January 15.  However, I have traditionally shared my reading list from the previous year, and I realize that a few of you have asked about it.  So, with that in mind, here is what nourished me spiritually and academically in 2013.  On Friday, I will post my preliminary reading list for 2014.

Books I Reviewed

  • David T. Bourgeois, Ministry in the Digital Age (for Stone-Campbell Journal)
  • Carpenter, Sweet and Blythe, Introduction to Applied Creative Thinking (for Teaching Theology and Religion)
  • Keith Francis and William Gibson, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the British Sermon, 1689-1901 (for Stone-Campbell Journal)
  • Gregory Hunt, Leading Congregations through Crisis (for Stone-Campbell Journal)
  • Rita Schulte, Shattered (for ACU Press "Book Club" blog)
Books I Read for Classes I Teach

  • David Fleer and Dave Bland, ed., Preaching Mark's Unsettling Messiah (Expository Preaching)
  • George Hunter, The Celtic Way of Evangelism (Evangelism in the Local Church)
  • Charles Talbert, Reading Luke, rev. ed. (Gospel of Luke)
  • N. T. Wright, The Early Christian Letters for Everyone (General Letters)
  • Philip Yancey, What Good Is God? (Providence and Suffering)
Books I Read for My Dissertation

  • Karl Barth, Homiletics
  • Joan Bolker, Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day
  • Raymond Collins, 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus
  • Edward Farley, Practicing Gospel
  • Luke Timothy Johnson, Letters to Paul's Delegates
  • Kostenberger and Wilder, ed., Entrusted with the Gospel
  • Abraham Malherbe, Paul and the Popular Philosophers
  • Andrew Purves, Pastoral Theology in the Classical Tradition
  • Andrew Purves, The Crucifixion of Ministry
  • Andrew Purves, The Resurrection of Ministry
  • Ronald Sisk, The Competent Pastor
  • Paul Scott Wilson, Preaching and Homiletic Theory
  • Frances Young, The Theology of the Pastoral Letters
Books I Read for Fun

  • Natalie Babbitt, Tuck Everlasting
  • Bonnie Baeder, Who Was Martin Luther King, Jr.?
  • Augsten Burroughs, This Is How
  • Paulo Coelho, The Alchemist
  • Ian Fleming, For Your Eyes Only
  • Ian Fleming, From Russia with Love
  • Ian Fleming, Goldfinger
  • Ian Fleming, Man with the Golden Gun
  • Ian Fleming, Octopussy and The Living Daylights
  • Ian Fleming, On Her Majesty's Secret Service
  • Ian Fleming, The Spy Who Loved Me
  • Ian Fleming, You Only Live Twice
  • Barbara Kingsolver, The Poisonwood Bible
  • C. S. Lewis, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
  • Alan Paton, Cry, the Beloved Country
  • Robert Louis Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
  • J. R. R. Tolkien, The Hobbit
  • Leo Tolstoy, The Death of Ivan Ilyich
Books I Read for Seminars

  • C. Leonard Allen, Things Unseen (Theology in Ministry)
  • O. Wesley Allen, Determining the Form (Sermon Development and Delivery)
  • Chris Altrock, Preaching to Pluralists (Connecting Preaching with the Congregation)
  • Bartholomew and Goheen, The Drama of Scripture (Connecting Preaching with the Congregation)
  • Kennon Callahan, Small, Strong Congregations (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • Ron Crandall, Turnaround and Beyond (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • Ruth Ann Gaede, ed., Transitions in Congregations (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • Hicks, Melton and Valentine, A People Gathered (Theology and Ministry)
  • Richard Jensen, Envisioning the Word (Connecting Preaching with the Congregation)
  • Michael Lindvall, The Good News from North Haven (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • Andrew Purves, Reconstructing Pastoral Theology (Theology in Ministry)
  • David Ray, The Indispensable Guide for Smaller Churches (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • Lyle Schaller, Middle-Sized Church (Ministry in Small and Middle-Sized Churches)
  • James Thompson, Pastoral Ministry according to Paul (Theology in Ministry)
  • Jason Vickers, Minding the Good Ground (Theology in Ministry)
  • Sondra Willobee, The Write Stuff (Connecting Preaching with the Congregation)

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Now You See Me

Note: This is a continuation of posts from my Advanced Preaching students at Kentucky Christian University.  I (and they) would appreciate some feedback!

Guest author: Andrew Ullom (@LupisNox)

“Now you don’t.” This was the message four magicians received in the movie Now You See Me.  These four magicians were give a series of very specific instructions, and no other explanation as to why other than a name, The Eye.  These magicians, The Four Horsemen, literally spend years fulfilling these instructions.  They have to sacrifice their chance at careers, at money, and at power.  They have to risk going to prison, losing their credibility, and even death to accomplish their beliefs.  They do all this without ever once meeting The Eye.  In the end they accomplish the plans left for them and inspire new faith in millions and millions of people.  After it’s all over, they finally will get to see their mysterious benefactor.  These magicians’ faith, changed the way people viewed this lost and dying art.  They made people believers again.

Oh, by the way, there’s a note here for you too. Matthew 28:19-20 “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” (NIV)  - signed “I Am”

Thursday, July 11, 2013

A Message of Release

In Luke 4, following His trial in the desert, Jesus returns to His hometown of Nazareth.  While He is home, Jesus attends the weekly synagogue service, something it seems He did on a regular basis.  As such, He is asked to read from that week’s assigned text and provide a teaching on the meaning of the text.  In the text for his sermon, Jesus links Isaiah 61:1-2 with Isaiah 58:6.  Together these passages herald the coming of the Messiah, the one who will “bring good news to the poor.”  The poor in Luke’s Gospel are not only those who are poor financially but also those who poor in spirit.  Jesus says that He will overturn the social status of the poor and redefine the term as a cultural term rather than an economic term.[1]  The Messiah will not only “bring good news to the poor,” He will also “proclaim release to the captives.”  Later, in Luke 5:20, Jesus heals a paralyzed man by proclaiming that the man’s sins have been forgiven.  The Greek word from which we get “forgive” can also mean “release.  Therefore, Jesus literally released this man from his sins!  When He came “to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor,” Jesus came to proclaim a message of forgiveness and release from sin.

You may be wondering why I offer these thoughts from Luke 4.  Well, on one hand, I am teaching a summer class on Luke and Luke 4 was today’s reading.  Preaching and teaching, after all, finds its genesis in our own daily disciplines.  On the other hand, this reading causes me to stop and reflect on what message I offer to people each week in my preaching and teaching.  The air in religious circles is always thick with debates and discussions.  The battles that are waged in pulpits across the country today over the theological and political definition of marriage or the role of women in church leadership are not new topics, just this week’s or this year’s topic.  These are important theological and political issues that church-folk need to address.  However, let us not get so bogged down in counting how many angels can stand on the head of a pin that we forget to “bring good news to the poor” and “proclaim release to the captives.”  There is a time and place for defining the particulars of our doctrines and practices.  We should and must do so if we are to consider ourselves pious (i.e., practicing) Christians.  Yet, let us not forget our mission.  For as long as there is breath in our lungs, our mission is to “proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor,” which means bringing “good news to the poor” and proclaiming “release to the captives.”


[1]Joel B. Green, The Theology of the Gospel of Luke, New Testament Theology (Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 81-82. 

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Measuring Effectiveness

Over the weekend, a friend of mine posted a picture on Facebook that brought back some memories.  When I was in college, I launched and directed a Christian theatre troupe that traveled to youth rallies, retreats, camps, and even Sunday night devotionals to talk about our faith through sketches.  It was great fun, and an early crucible for me to learn about leadership.  This particular picture was taken 15 September 2001 at a congregation just outside Pittsburg.  The congregation had invited us to perform for a small youth rally.  However, if you noticed the date, the nation was in a moment of crisis.  The question was raised of whether we should go, given the circumstances.  I decided that we should go, and I asked who wanted to come.  It was a difficult decision, one that I really struggled with both before going and after returning.  We went and did our thing, having a great time in the process.  Also, about a week later, we received word that some teenagers who had been at that rally had decided to become Christians afterwards.  In the end, it was a missional win.

As I looked at the picture and reminisced over that particular trip, I started thinking about how we define effectiveness in ministry.  What defines a “win”?  How do we measure “success” in ministry?  For all practical purposes, this particular trip was questionable.  We traveled from Searcy, Arkansas, to Pittsburg during a national crisis when travel was being discouraged.  As I mentioned, it was a small rally.  The recruiting quotient was really low.  Only a few teenagers accepted Christ’s offer of salvation and were baptized, and even this was after the rally.  Was this trip “effective”?  Was this trip “successful”?  I know many who would say that we wasted our time going.  (In fact, another theatre troupe has turned the rally down, noting that it was “too small” for them to perform at.)  Yet, the Gospel was proclaimed and some accepted the call.  Why can that not be enough success for the Church?

I spent four years working as a hospital chaplain.  During that time, I came to the conclusion that no area of ministry is more emotionally, psychologically and spiritually challenging than chaplaincy.  During my first year, I was the pediatric chaplain, serving the Pediatric ICU and outpatient pediatric oncology unit.  Yeah.  The next three years, I spent working in the hospital’s Emergency Room.  Yeah.  My days were simple: Visit and pray with as many people as you can; complete your consults; make your unit meetings.  My days were difficult: Visit and pray with as many people as you can; complete your consults; make your meetings.  A “win” in chaplaincy is not being thrown out of a room.  In four years, I think that happened twice.  The question never was how people had I visited; it was had God been present to those in crisis.  And for that person or that family, being present and offering a prayer was, often, enough.

I have been in full-time ministry since 2001 (1997, if you count the theatre troupe).  Although I have done some consulting, I have yet to be invited to headline a national conference, although I speak at 2-3 conferences a year.  I have yet to serve a congregation larger than 200, unless you count those where I did my internships.  On paper, I would judged by many to be an ineffective and unsuccessful minister.  Yet, Jesus did not call us to build big churches.  He called us to “go” and “teach” and “pray” and “forgive” and “baptize” and “make disciples,” and leave the kingdom-building up to Him, His Father, and the Spirit.  To that end, I think I have been effective because I am fighting the good fight, running the race, and keeping the faith.  And so are you.  Brother and sister in ministry, I hope you find this encouraging.  Grace and peace.   

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Your Church: Monument, Museum, or Mission?

Note: I realize that it has been some time since I have posted.  The goal of the plate-spinning trick is to make sure that the audience concentrates on the plates in the foreground and that they are still spinning at the end of the performance.  Over the past couple of months, this blog has been one of the background plates.  This is not an apology, merely a statement.

I woke up to a thought this morning: “Monument, museum, or mission?  Which best describes my congregation?”  I have traveled professionally more this year thus far to conferences, speaking engagements and consulting appointments than I have ever before.  And the number one question that I have been asked is what my vision is for the local congregation.  As Christians, we know that the Church will continue through God’s grace and the Spirit’s guidance. 

However that does not mean that local congregations are automatically going to continue opening their doors each week.  Now, most of these people who have asked to pick my brain assumed that I would automatically herald the bountiful blessings of the mega-church movement, validating that they—and only they—are the answer to the Church’s future.  “Bigger is better and better is forever,” I heard one leader say in a consulting session.  Yet, the longer that I work with congregations and the more research that I read, the less and less convinced I am that megas are the answer.  If you will hold one for a moment, let me explain what I mean.

I am not saying that mega-churches are unnecessary.  I think they were an evangelism trend that, in many cases, has seen its day.  However, they are here to stay.  What I am saying is that building a massive religiously-affiliated recreation complex in the middle of a cornfield in Indiana is not the answer.  What is the answer?  Simple: “Go, find someone who does not know about God, and tell them.  Teach them, pray with them, minister to them, baptize them, and disciple them to go and do likewise” (my paraphrase of Matthew 28:18-20).  The answer to unlocking the future of the local congregation is mission!

Think about your congregation for a moment: How would you describe it?  What goes on from Sunday to Sunday?  What values does your congregation hold?  What is the institutional ethic that powers your congregation?  Earlier this summer, my family and I drove to San Diego for vacation (they are still there).  Along the way, we saw a few monuments, some museums, and a mission or two.  Here is how they relate to the local congregation:
  •  Monument—The congregation is large, large enough to attract people simply with its presence.  It did not start that way, yet neither did the Lincoln Monument.  And neither did the story behind the monument.  It is open certain times during the week, inviting passersby and season-pass holders to come in and hear again the monument’s tale: “We started off small.  But we decided to reach out to the community, so we built a gym.  Then we added (a food pantry, daycare, outreach clinic, etc.).  And before you knew it, we built this big wonderful building!  Enjoy the coffee shop, and make sure you buy a CD or book from the gift shop on your way out.”  Like all monuments, some congregations have become testaments to the great things we did.  Yet they do not look to the future.
  • Museum—This congregation comes in all sizes.  Yet the defining mark of a “museum” congregation is that it is locked in the past.  Museums tells story, whereas monuments are simply for show.  Museums invite people to learn history, and perhaps be inspired to retell the story to someone else.  Living museums, like the Mormon Battalion in San Diego, are great at this.  “Museum” congregations have not experienced change in years, opting to stay locked into the “glory years” of their history and acting as if nothing has changed around them.  Fewer and fewer people come, dust collects in the corner, and the symbols become tarnished.  Yet the faithful continue to gather each week to retell their story in the hopes that someone new might be impressed enough by the show to drop a coin or two in the collection plate.
  • Mission—Whether they were in Ireland or San Antonio, missions existed for one reason: to serve as a central location for evangelism.  The monks and preachers would find their way to the mission, receive their “marching orders,” then go out and proclaim the Gospel to all they could find.  Today, “mission” congregations are not Sunday-only operations like “museum” congregations.  Nor are they like “monument” congregations where people must come to the building to take advantage of the membership perks.  “Mission” congregations are active and actively involved in their community.  For example, small groups are popular in “monument” congregations.  However, they have become focused almost primarily on fellowship.  The reason is because fellowship and community have been sacrificed on the altar of “bigger is better.”  Yet, “mission” congregations continue to effectively use small groups as evangelistic and discipleship tools because unchurched people are not going “to church” on Sundays.  Yet, they will meet at a pizza buffet or burger joint on Thursday night because they have to eat.  In short, “mission” congregations do not exist for the sake of an expansion project or to entertain the tourists.  They exist to proclaim the Story to as many people as possible.
So, which type of congregation best describes the one you attend?  Now, let me make something clear: Every congregation should be a “mission” congregation, regardless of size.  Smaller congregations are actually better-equipped to be “mission” congregations, yet that does not mean that mega-churches cannot be.  The problem is that smaller congregations operate out of a desperate need to stay open and mega-churches operate out of a consumerist mentality.  Yet both can and should be “mission” congregations.  The answer to whether we are a “mission” congregation is found in this question: Where is our focus?  Is it in here, or is it out there?

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Go Means Go!


I recently heard veteran preacher Ben Merold open a sermon with a startling revelation—every preacher will be out of a job someday.  Yes, that’s correct!  Every preacher will be out of a job someday.  Now, it’s not what you might be thinking.  We leave one ministry for another.  However, Ben’s revelation had more to the Revelation than real estate.  He stated that someday we will be gathered together before God’s throne.  And what will we do before God’s throne?  Sing!  With the Word standing before us, we will have no more reason to preach.  We will only worship.  So, for those of you who lead worship, consider this time practice time for eternity.  Some of us are going to need the help in Heaven.


However, for those of us who preach, time is of the essence.  We have work to do.  Preachers and teachers prepare people for Heaven.  Regardless of how we might define it, we are in the fishing business.  When I was in college, I launched a traveling theatre troupe called “Fisher’s Men.”  Our purpose was simple—to use theatre to share the Gospel with (primarily) teenagers.  We traveled to Pittsburg following 9/11 and performed at a youth rally.  It was a modest youth rally, and we were able to bring comfort and laughs to a grieving community.  About a week later, we received an email from one of the teenagers who had been at the youth rally.  He informed us that he appreciated us coming from Arkansas and sharing our faith in Jesus.  As a result, he became a Christian the Sunday after the rally.  Jesus once said, “Follow me, and I will make you fish for people” (Matthew 4:19).


However, going is not simply going a long way.  Going simply means “progress” or “advancement.”  As long as the Gospel is advancing, we are fulfilling Christ’s command (Matthew 28:18-20).  Going also means going across the street or going across the hall.  We often confuse global evangelism with world travel or relief work.  Now, there is nothing wrong with either activity, especially relief work which is desperately needed in many parts of our world.  However, sharing our faith requires us to tell another about our faith.  The question is, will we share our faith with our neighbors, co-workers and classmates?  It is easier to share our faith with a total stranger.  Yet, we are called to go.  Jesus said that the church’s mission would start in a city, then move to a state, then to a country, then to the four corners of the world (Acts 1:8).  Yet, it starts locally.  Go on mission trips, yet do not neglect those who are spiritually stubbing their toes in the darkness at home.  “Follow me, and I will make you fish for people” (Matthew 4:19).